安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









Hence the balancing act that always has to be done. If you want a fun game-design exercise, analyze some other games you play for such limitations, be it something in your library, Yu-gi-oh, Magic, even Settlers of Catan... then consider what happens if that limitation is removed and how it can warp he game's dynamic as a whole.
One alternative is to allow something like Blow the Man down to nuke the entire board but at normal keg damage (max 29 damage), which means you can now do your play, but if you're not nuking large swaths of the board with a ton of prep it just feels worse to play the card. Another is to just not design any cards like it, and that neuters the overall fun a bit.
Card images are all the same. Why are they even here if it doesn't matter? You have small text, combined with no visual representation.
Visual style is nice, but there is A LOT of noise textures.