安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
奖励
Snow = Ice Sheet
hahahahhaa
3) Is there a reason you went with Prairie instead of Savanna? I read through the comments and saw several mentions of savanna, but I did not see any discussion of why you chose prairie instead.
Savanna seems a more universal term as it is used to describe biomes in Africa, North & South America, Australia and Europe whereas prairie is largely a North American specific term.
1) I agree "Jungle" is negative and misleading (it would work better if Jungle tiles only appeared at the edges of Forests and along Rivers). But the current mechanics for Jungles in game don't seem to apply very well to the idea of Rainforests:
In game, Jungles are devoid of production, take a long time to clear, and yield no hammers upon clearing - presumably to represent the difficulty and counter-productivity of trying to traverse the dense vegetation of real world "jungles".
But beyond its jungle barrier, a real world rainforest has no such limitation - and humans have engaged in productive logging of rainforest lumber just like any other forest. Perhaps adding a hammer yield when chopping Rainforests could help with immersion here? (but maybe it would affect game balance too much).