安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









According to Build Info, the slot stats are correct, however I'm not getting the 300% yield that the description promises with all four slots connected to the refinery.
Max required input on the refinery is reported at 3.41 MW, which is lower.
A refinery with four yield modules produces 140 ingots from 100 iron ore. Refine speed 130%, yield 200%, and efficiency 100%.
A refinery with one general productivity module produces 121 ingots from 100 iron ore. Refine speed 430%, yield 173%, efficiency 66%.
If you're going purely for speed and perhaps an industrial aesthetic, this may be for you. If, however, you're going for maximum yield efficiency, you should go with standard yield-modules only.
I suppose in the end, these are meant to be the central part of your design, rather than the actual production machine itself. Still, I'd love to see another variation of this idea but with the Industrial DLC variants of the machinery in mind, such that I could use one of these modules with my Industrial DLC production machines.
That is to say, if we respect the direction (up and down) of placement of the refineries, then the door of this module will be vertical.
If, on the other hand, we place this module horizontally (as in the images on this page) so that the door is parallel to the ground (as in real life), then the refinery will necessarily have to stick underneath and upside down.