安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









With the tribesman change, I'm typically the type to use levies up until I have a large enough nation to support more than one legion, and by that point you typically have more than enough manpower anyway so that's probably why I didn't notice much of a change on that end.
On the topic of civilization value, reaching a high civilization value is difficult on purpose. If you take into account all sources of civilization value in vanilla, it's quite easy to reach max civilization value on almost all of your provinces. That's why I had to reduce the base increase of civilization value for all buildings. In any case, I'll probably increase the base value by a bit since the value buildings give does seem a bit too low.
For tribesmen, how do you think I can make the difference more noticeable and meaningful? Their intended effect is to give manpower which will be ever so critical when you transition to standing armies.