安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









The actual flow out of each switch's outlet depends on that branch's pressure, which in turn is based off some poorly understood equation and the smallest pipe in the path. The path with all big pipes gets the large pipe's multiple applied to its pressure, while the path with medium and large pipes gets the medium pipe's smaller multiple applied to its pressure, much like with pressure gained/lost with elevation.
I've done some testing: connected 3 small water towers to one side of a big tower via switch using only big pipes, while on the other side of the same tower I made a similar configuration, but using one big pipe into three medium ones.
Logic suggests that there should be no difference in total water flow, since three medium pipes combined can move greater volume of water than a singular big one, yet somehow the side with three big pipes not only has higher pressure, thus delivering more water, but also goes over the maximum throughput of a large pipe by about 100 m³.
If you want, though I am kind of taking a break from water stuff.
I am sure you can understand why.