安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
奖励
Powerful forward thrust = High speed for blockade running (meaning brakes not priority.)
Artillery only = "Endgame" resources = extensive exploring and established presence needed.
No airlock system = Gunboats are cheap. Don't like it? Make your own upgrades.
Total = Fast response ship for a well established faction that needs a cheap and reliable ships.
Don't bash something because your situation or position does not support a particular model of craft. Its designed for a purpose, don't force it to become something it was not meant to be, play to its strengths.
- Forwards facing thrust is absolutely atrocious, the main thrust propels this thing way too fast and the ship cannot really slow down appropriately, the only compensation is the quick gyro response allowing you to 180 in order to slow down.
- "Artillery only" setup, I currently play on a planet, meaning no uranium, that means I'm unable to really produce any artillery shells at all, a mix of artillery/assault cannon would be better. Potentially even some tertiary defenses in form of autocannons/gatling turrets for close in support.
- The lack of an actual airlock/pressurization, right after the sliding doors there's a passage that could be converted into an airlock. In the roof of the deck there's also enough space left to include an air vent (I know you could just go into the seat and get air that way, but still, you can potentially have a few passengers in the back who'd have to remain in an unpressurized space)