安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题










1.) No
2.) No
1.) Are the priority changes global? For example, a modded faction with new buildings, will their buildings that the mod author classified under “military” or "defense" be prioritized?
2.) Does this cancel CA's priority changes for AI to build more resource buildings?
Thank you!
The proportion of buildings has been distributed in:
Military: 66%
Support: 34%
Defensive: 0% (All defensive buildings are now categorized as military)
Because of this, AI in minor settlements does not have protective walls and because of this it is very easy to storm them.
The primary feature that Incata let me borrow for Prios Reworked is his modification pulling structures out of the defensive category, and putting them in military, with the associated rebalance of build distribution to 66% military, 34% support. This is to try to get them recruiting better.
About 90% of the rest of Prios Reworked is a massive list of rules for the AI to follow when building their provinces up. It is a mix of "set the priority for X buildings higher to make them more likely," and a list of rules like, "Don't build a barracks in a major settlement, they go in minor settlements," etc.