安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









https://psteamcommunity.yuanyoumao.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2599504692
Just to clarify, I wasnt trying to insult, lol. Just curious, since im sure that'll have a performance impact, however slight.
Worth having the comparisons if the difference is noticeable.
I used real-ESRGAN upscale AI, not only doubled the resolution, but also make it more clear.The size of the texture is tripled as well.
Graphic setting+ make more than 128x texture functional in game.
But if you think this work is point less, you can use original mod, after all this is a texture replace mod, won't have any game version issue.
Not sure there is enough difference to justify the texture size increase?
Might need a side by side with the originals.