安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









Wanna say sorry for wasting your time earlier.
Though I WISH there was more I could do, unless I'm missing it, I don't see an error on my end, and I'm not sure how to replicate it. Will come back with a log if I realized I missed something. Clearly I need to double check.
Now I'm not sure if its a new incompatibility with Better Intimacy, but that's the only thing that has a chance to do weird crap as it disables the hook up system.
Well, if it were me (and it's not, I certainly appreciate the work you and other modders put in), I'd first lean into making it so that the initial romance is unlikely to happen. But when and if it does, then it would assign a secret penalty to the pairing that can be anywhere from 0 to relevant_config_value and that affects all their romance-based/sex-based interactions.
The penalty would only be generated at the start of the relationship, because if you keep on generating it over time with bad odds, eventually the relationship is going to fall apart. That way you end up with some relationships where "love wins" while others are more fraught.