安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
奖励
- 67 HP (like Red Crested Skinks)
- 50 Armor (like Red Crested Skink Chief. This shouldn't have more)
- 65 Leadership (Like Stalkers and RCSC)
- 35 Weapon Strength (25/10AP)
- 26 MA (same as Tier 1 Red Crested Skinks. Up to 28 could be argued)
- 34 MD (min 32) (Stalkers & Skink Chief have 36, Saurus Warriors 34, This will help hold the line, but not as well as Saurus with ~25% more HP.)
- 4 ammo (+1 vs Skink Cohort. This should be melee focused - Chameleons exist for ranged)
- 80 missile range (As Skink Cohort. But accuracy should be slightly better)
- 22 missile damage (15/7)
So overall, slightly better in melee combat (holding) but with some reduction to missile power. Still far from as sturdy as Saurus. Any costs to be balanced.
Adding melee bonus vs Infantry (e.g. +5) could be interesting as a role to clear out chaff infantry, but with a price to match.
Could you update the screenshot card as the stats in game are very different (not so overpowered like the image).
Stats in game for others (Jan 16 2023):
- 120 models on ultra (like Red Crested Skinks)
- 70 HP per unit
- 60 Armor
- 62 Leadership
- 21 MA
- 27 MD
- 38 Weapon Strength (28/10AP)
- 17 Charge Bonus
- 6 Ammo
- 95 Range
- 26 Missile Strength (17/9) (might be 18/9: starting tech is adding to it)
- No Bonuses vs Large/Small/Other