安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题










I meant if I'm very bored sometime and I remember...
> And yea, I see why you don't use the editor... it is a mess to use and very unintuitive... also probably explains why the editor struggles to parse your mods. Supposedly all the option buttons in your mods are empty, according to the editor. XD
Hm, I may look into the options being blank. but eh.
Looking at the change log it took me four months before I added a func to ECM so I could upload mods, and not have to use the mod editor for anything :)
And yea, I see why you don't use the editor... it is a mess to use and very unintuitive... also probably explains why the editor struggles to parse your mods. Supposedly all the option buttons in your mods are empty, according to the editor. XD
> Is it possible to add the 'x performance without workers' perk to the existing tech?
Yeah, that shouldn't be too annoying to do.
I take it you think this mod is too cheaty? I don't think it'd be too hard to hide this mod behind the tech?
Then you can use an OnMsg.TechResearched to wait for the tech to show up, and the code from this mod to change the factories.
Just so you know: Adding new breakthroughs will change each locations breakthrough list, so anyone using the maps website won't be able to use them.