安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









Oh! Very useful information, thank you.
I will upgrade a new version to change about this.
i wanna say after pdx change pop scalling where old 1 pop = 100 in 4.0, this 5 amenities not have any sense anymore, it must be 500, or just delete them, cos i never get any amenities shortage in new patch, 1-2k most low number i see
By design, we have two upgrade path for Spaceport building,
Advanced Spaceport
and
Spaceport Complex
the benefit of upgrade to first one is less, but have ability to build/connect to an orbital station directly for the planet, to simulate this planet is focus on trade/communicate with other planet/system
the benefit of upgrade to second one is more, but it can not connect to an orbital station directly for the planet, to simulate this planet is focus on local planet develop
You should select build either orbital station or orbital ring on a planet.
--
On technical point of view it is possible to let them exist together (to make new one just as a ship, not a starbase), but this will make the ship one can't be trace by the outliner
So to make it as a selection is better implement method I think.