安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









It looks like the issue mentioned below is indeed with the naming conventions changing for some building sets:
1) wh_main_set_empire_temple is NOW wh_main_set_empire_military_support
2) wh2_mnain_set_lizard_temple is now wh2_main_set_lizardmen_military_support (interestingly, the game also seems to include those lizardmen building chains in wh2_main_set_lzd, although I'm not sure why the chains are in both sets)
Swapping out the names (and probably adding a couple lines for the wh2_main_set_lzd) in both db --> building_set_to_building_junctions_tables and db --> building_sets_tables should get those factions to work normally.
I poked around with my extremely limited skills in RPFM, and the only spots I can find those chains referenced is in db --> building_set_to_building_junctions_tables and db --> building_sets_tables. Of note, I did NOT see any duplication among dwarf settlements with resource chains (also mentioned in those sections of the pack file).
Perhaps there was a naming convention or syntax change with the December update for some building chains?