安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






















I'm always looking to improve, so I do appreciate honest feedback and criticism. I have altered ships in the past in response to comments made.
As for the "flat and unpolished" visual design. We all have our styles, and what may be appealing to you may not be to others, and vise-versa. I spent a long time pouring over the design of the exterior to get it as presentable as possible and came up with something that I'm proud of, and matches my style.
The shape this ship uses works well for combat ships with heavy front armor, while keeping the thrusters in the rear makes them somewhat hidden.
And that's where we run into issues, this ship is definitely not made for that type of combat, judging from the gun locations, most of which are broadside and for broadside ships a good shape is being somewhat wide and flat, with armored sides.
Also the solutions are pretty simple, not enough of something - add more, too much PCU - optimize the design.
Waste of PCU for the size
Tons of ladders that are annoying to climb
Typos like emergancy and hanger
Strange weapon placements, especially for missile launchers, that make them pretty much useless
Low thrust
For some reason basic assembler and refinery
Cluttered control panel and toolbar config
Only 3 O2/H2 generators