安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









WHICH IS PRETTY WEIRD. I don't really get it, honestly. But, other than that, I don't think anything will exactly go wrong - these are patches, correct?
Medieval adds the 'light plate helmet,' which has a whopping -4.0 shooting accuracy citing it 'slightly restrict[ing] the wearer's field of vision.' Except it's an open-front helmet.
Armour adds the 'plate helmet' which has a paltry -0.1 shooting accuracy and no such mention. They both otherwise have the exact same stats except Armour's plate helmet covers the eyes, nose, and jaw (as it should).
The issue is that it seems the two items have their shooting accuracy backwards. Armour's plate helmet should have the -4.0 shooting accuracy and Medieval's light plate helmet shouldn't have any.