安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









While developing a new ECU using the above, I ran a test between your updated formula and the original. I initially found it to be slightly worse; this was before getting further into the ECU and adding load (medium gen to a flat 6 test engine). I ran a final test when I was done with everything and found that yours was indeed slightly better. Just to add to your claim and make others aware.
(F/A) = (7+(0.07p))/AFR(s,T)
AFR calculation is still the same
fuel pressure is still irrelevant afaik
Found that I had
air intake -> pressure sensor -> pump -> manifold getting AFR 14.9
moved sensor to be next to manifold
air intake -> pump -> pressure sensor -> manifold getting AFR 13.7
observed air pressure ~11 and fluid ~33-44
Added to my microcontroller a property to multiply the manifold
Used 0.932 normal fuel manifold to get to 14.7
Why 0.932? just dividing 13.7 seen by 14.7 desired
Im assuming the pressure update somehow gets more fuel down the manifold
If the pressure of fluids now being a thing do we need to include the fuel pressure as part of the equations?
After the pressure gasses update I came back to an earlier built boat. The actual AFR is coming in at 14.9 - 15 rather than the 14.7 target. Have your or others seen this since that update? Have you done something particular to restore getting to the target? Is it over charging the air on the super charger or not getting enough fuel pulled in? Not sure which of the update changes it might be.
My approach was to try to replicate what a real life Ecu does: it measures inlet air temperature and pressure and, on the basis of its map, it calculates how much fuel the engine needs at the given time.
My first try to do that was to use the air volume coming from the cylinder's data, then I realised that this process was too difficult because I needed a stable engine to do the testing. Now, with my actual system, I have a quite stable engine but I don't have time to test a solution based only on the cylinder's data.
I also think we always have to take into account for the air throttle in our formula, because without that we will need a PID to regulate the fuel throttle.
I'm glad you have got the point of my formula/ECU system. Thank you for your question.