安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题










Absolutely right, though - this does showcase that well, even if I didn't really think about it when designing the map
(I think this is how it works if you build a yard for x streetcar's and use it hosting 2 x x .)
(It's also a good map to show why smaller networks (with 'turning loops' at both end of the line) sometimes decide to buy streetcars with a 'cab' at both ends or at least a simple 'cab' at the end of the consist to make it easier to go backwards. I remember one situation in the Netherlands where, despite of having cabs on both ends, at the yard was made a 'turning loop' to equalize the wear of the wheels on both sides.)
thanks for building :)