安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
It's really good.
Glazing complete.
Best part is most of them kinda just... make sense? Even though they're often functionally more cheesy than more typical rimworld tricks, the "yup that's literally how things have been or could be done irl" factor just makes it feel less cheesy.
It's literally just a wall you stand on, then get off of and behind to avoid getting blasted to hell. Just stick an embrasure in front of it and you've got how a lot of actual fortifications were designed.
A player puts down a sloped wall and then makes a pawn climb on top of it. They then circle that sloped wall with barricades, embrasures, chunks, anything that counts as cover.
Is the pawn still protected by that cover, and it's just that the sloped wall doesn't provide any *additional* cover.
Or is the pawn not protected by that cover, and it's that the sloped wall prevents benefiting from cover from *other* things. The pawn is just as vulnerable as they would be if there were no sources of cover around the slope they're stool on.
Out of curiosity, when it says "edges provide no cover to those standing on them", does that mean that someone won't benefit from cover between them and whoever/whatever they're shooting at?
I love this mod.