安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









It's definitely personal preference but I think just giving people the option to make the vanilla system more aggressive opens up a good middle ground. (for instance maybe it doesn't apply INSTANTLY, but it only takes like 3 hours for it to take hold. That'd still make the bites incredibly dangerous and top priority to deal with without letting one rabid dog destroy an entire colony with what is essentially a melee berserk psycast.)
The practical answer is not much but it can snowball a lot quicker, usually you're not going to get basegame scaria _in_ combat. This will drive people berserk in the middle of combat. Better for some kinds of zombie playthrough for example. Potentially it might be worth adding a way to tweak that basegame percentage but if everyone is just happy with the basegame setup there won't be much point. Imo we're in a wait and see situation. It might be that we don't need to update to 1.7. But lets see what the community does with it all.