商店页面
Total War: ROME II - Emperor Edition
全部 讨论 截图 艺术作品 实况直播 视频 创意工坊 新闻 指南 评测

Total War: ROME II - Emperor Edition

商店页面
Total War: ROME II - Emperor Edition >  创意工坊 > Boicote 的创意工坊
90 个评价
Populares vs Optimates
描述 讨论1 留言75 改动说明
   
奖励
收藏
已收藏
取消收藏
标签： mod, Campaign
文件大小
发表于
更新日期
67.503 KB
2014 年 4 月 7 日 上午 10:45
2017 年 12 月 1 日 上午 8:17
16 项改动说明 （ 查看 ）
创建者
Boicote
离线
查看所有由 Boicote 和其他人创建的 36 个合集（也许有些被隐藏了）
12,861 不重复访客数
377 当前订阅者
168 当前收藏人数

订阅以下载
Populares vs Optimates

在 Boicote 的 1 个合集中
Boicote's Mods
18 件物品
描述
This mod replaces the roman families with the two main political factions of Ancient Rome: the “Optimates” and the “Populares”.
Some historians describe the political struggles in the Roman Republic as a conflict between two political "parties": the Optimates and the Populares. The Optimates were conservatives who wanted to secure the power of the senate. On the other hand, the Populares sought popular support against the dominant power of the senate.
Which side do you support? :)

The mod is compatible with patch 18 (Power and Politics). It's is lo longer compatible with the most recent patches and I will not update it because this mod lost much of its relevance after the patch 19 and patch 20 (ancestral update).
热门讨论 查看全部（1）
0
2018 年 8 月 18 日 上午 9:48
Update
Jesus Loves You^_^
75 条留言
< >
88888888 7 月 30 日 下午 5:30 
This is really funny. I thought the "political party" myth about the Republic had died completely in like the 90s. Do or did people really believe this bunk as recently as the 2010s?
dneddo91 2021 年 3 月 17 日 下午 7:16 
This mod still works. which is crazy cause it says it is outdated.I wish to understand why and maybe add more awsome mods claimed to being outdated
vonVince 2020 年 12 月 29 日 上午 10:09 
@Gnaeus Cornelius Scipio Asina - yes, it still works: many mods that are said to be "out of date" still work.
Tiberios Horatios 2019 年 9 月 20 日 下午 4:59 
this mod works? My mod manager says it's out of date. Can anyone confirm?
==FANATIC== 2019 年 9 月 4 日 上午 8:24 
But I never find the Optimates gaining any power. I can never recruit generals or new characters from that factions The Optimates should be a large opposing force to the Populares, they are the ones resisting changes put forward by the Populares. in every single game I have started, they are the laughing stock of the senate. I'm more likely to have a civil war with the non-partisans than the opposition!

And when I want a big partisan civil war like real late rome, that just doesn't fit my purpose. I'd rather having an unrealistic two party system than having a fight with the 'Viri Collegium';

May I note that the screenshot shows power share as exactly 47 vs 53.
vonVince 2019 年 9 月 3 日 上午 2:09 
For anyone curious, the mod still works. Also, Technocratic Archfiend - there have always been more than two factions in the games political system (it just doesn't appear that way in the screenshot because it only shows the two topmost political factions), and it makes sense to have them, because even in real Rome besides the optimates and the populares there would have been people outside of them.
==FANATIC== 2019 年 8 月 26 日 下午 1:05 
Heya, so what update is the screenshot from? I'm rolling back my Rome 2 to play it, but every time, In patch 17, patch 18 and Patch 19 all have Four Parties, including the viri collegium and etc. I really want just two factions because the two non partisan parties keep gaining major dominance and my counterpart is always hugely dwarfed in power and I have no way to stop them growing in power unless I only recruit from my own party, however that doesn't stop my counterpart party never offers generals to recruit.
Boicote  [作者] 2018 年 8 月 21 日 下午 7:11 
As long as I know, CiG campaign doesn't have family tree. Perhaps this is the solution for this mods.I will try to implement that. However I cannot promisse anything (I dont own CIG...)
Commander Reincarnation 2018 年 8 月 21 日 下午 5:43 
Maybe add an obsolete tag, or abandoned tag to let other know it's no longer supported?
==FANATIC== 2018 年 8 月 20 日 上午 5:26 
Sorry, ignore Crassus, that was a mistype.