安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









The scaling problem in the game is so severe and it affects everything. Capacity, population, parameters and mechanisms are designed from ground up to have scaling in mind. Still it is severely out of proportion. For example, when you want a map to represent hundreds of kilometers, literally the long station needed for long enough high speed or commuter trains you need covers half a city.
I have have actually thought that the curvature penalties should be reduced or possible have a modifier that comes from the specific map to represent ground scale.
I think what the game actually needs is a boost of accelleration and curve speed, rather than a buffer, or some possibility to link this to the scale - take the average distance between two of the larger cities on the map and make sure the trains can reach 100% speed in less than 1/3 of that distance.