安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









Borignev:
Well, I'm not sure about that. Kashubian may officially belong to the same branch as Pomeranian, but I personally don't agree with this classification.
As I see it, at the certain point, the Old Polish, a very beautiful language, got spread too quickly over other Slavic languages territories, which damaged them all (including today Polish) and created this "Lechtic" category we know today. But that's not what they really are historically.
Also, Kashubian is very east Slavic languages in comparison with the original Pomeranian language, which was very west . That's why I made it a Low Sorbian, despite it's not much better, because it's technically also quite Polabian and damaged by Polish (especially the pronunciation).
There actually is a discussion thread for this kind of suggestion, so if you should have written it there. :/
And about the answer...
Your suggestion isn't bad. You translated it as "Polzen'", which is basically the same as my " Poleznoye". The only difference is that "Polzen'" (Ползень) is (or should be) feminine, while " Poleznoye" (Полезное) is neuter. This change happened because... well, it's a Slavic thing. I can't explain it well in the limited space of comments, since it's not a discussion.