商店页面
边缘世界 RimWorld
全部 讨论 截图 艺术作品 实况直播 视频 创意工坊 新闻 指南 评测

边缘世界 RimWorld

商店页面
RimWorld >  创意工坊 > Kittah Khan 的创意工坊
522 个评价
[Kit] Just A Flesh Wound
描述 讨论2 留言548 改动说明
3
3
6
2
2
   
奖励
收藏
已收藏
取消收藏
Mod, 1.5, 1.6
文件大小
发表于
更新日期
1.161 MB
2020 年 10 月 17 日 上午 3:52
8 月 13 日 下午 1:35
58 项改动说明 （ 查看 ）
必需物品
这件物品需要以下所有其它物品
创建者
Kittah Khan
离线
查看所有 20655 个合集（也许有些被隐藏了）
34,117 不重复访客数
27,400 当前订阅者
1,928 当前收藏人数

订阅以下载
[Kit] Just A Flesh Wound

描述
What does this mod do?
  • Body parts are harder to destroy with weak hits. Big hits still destroy parts.
  • Implants and limb replacements make pawns harder to kill.
  • Implants and limb replacements make the body part harder to destroy.
  • Humanoids and animals do not die from being downed anymore.
  • The fatal damage mechanic in vanilla has been tweaked significantly, pawns are harder to kill with chip damage.
  • Internal organ wounds hurt, bleed and scar more and get infected more often.
  • Wounds to eyes and brains scar normally but there is a high chance to scar.
  • Wounds hurt less when fresh, reach a peak after some time, and come back down after that.
  • Wounds that have been tended immediately jump to the end of the pain cycle.
  • Wounds bleed less when fresh, reach a peak after some time and clot after that, reducing bleeding on wounds that are untreated for a long time.
  • Scars hurt less as time passes.
  • Scars do not count towards body part destruction, they do count towards functionality.
In summary, pawns are less likely to lose body parts and don't immediately go down from moderate injuries, untended injuries are bad. wounds to vital organs are very bad, combat medics are good, go juice is amazing. You can send a hurt pawn back out to fight after their wounds are treated.

I want to disable/change something. Can I?
Everything to do with injuries is configurable, if you wanted, you could make this mod do (almost) nothing at all. Don't do that, it would make me sad.

Is it compatible with X?
(Mostly) Yes.
The way I've implemented this mod should make it compatible with most things.
Post a comment if you find an exception to this.

Known Incompatibilities:
Tweaks Galore, Disable Lethal Damage Threshold option (from: Allachor)

This mod can substitute for the following mods:
Custom Death Randomness
Raiders Never Die
Pawns Just Don't Die
Live With The Pain
No More Lethal Damage Threshold

And is also an excellent companion mod for:
Death Rattle
Smart Medicine
Elite Bionics Framework

I want less scarring.
You can achieve this by reducing the following settings:
Scarring, minimum conversion.
Scarring, maximum conversion.

These two settings govern how large scars can be.
Scars that fall under Scarring, threshold are deleted.
热门讨论 查看全部（2）
4
10 月 30 日 下午 4:58
Q&A - direct your questions here
Kittah Khan
11
2
2024 年 7 月 19 日 下午 10:10
Mod Settings
RedPine
548 条留言
< >
Kittah Khan  [作者] 10 月 27 日 上午 10:51 
@RomainG
"Tweaks Galore, Disable Lethal Damage Threshold option (from: Allachor)"

To rephrase: The Disable Lethal Damage Threshold option from Tweaks Galore is incompatible (it should be turned off), as reported by Allachor.
RomainG 10 月 27 日 上午 12:53 
Hey, thanks for this great mod ! Quick question tho, why is it not compatible with tweaks galore ? Is it not compatible with certain options that we should keep turned off or is it not compatible with the mod as a whole ?
Ridigan 10 月 13 日 下午 7:35 
aight, ty
Kittah Khan  [作者] 10 月 13 日 下午 7:28 
@Ridigan
Only future scars, it's a check that happens when the wound is inflicted, to be precise.
Ridigan 10 月 13 日 下午 6:58 
does messing with Scarring Threshold retroactively fix scars, or will it only apply for future scars? I messed around with seeing what would happen if I set the threshold way too high, but none of the scars on my guys fixed themselves
Kittah Khan  [作者] 9 月 27 日 上午 8:07 
@xuelin
No worries, have fun learning.
xuelin 9 月 27 日 上午 7:59 
sorry， I have discovered my mistake. I am researching how this mod is implemented, but I only have a basic programming foundation. Most of them rely on AI to learn and research.
Kittah Khan  [作者] 9 月 27 日 上午 7:37 
@xuelin
In function GetEHPModifier, Line 151 in Shared.cs you have:

if (null == hediff.Part) {
continue;
}

if (null != part && hediff.Part != part) {
continue;
}

if (false == (hediff is Hediff_AddedPart) && false == (hediff is Hediff_Implant)) {
continue;
}



On Line 178 you have:

if (null == part) {
delta *= hediff.Part.coverageAbsWithChildren;
}

Part can be null, in that case it looks at the effect on total health, if it's non-null, it looks at the effect on part health.
xuelin 9 月 27 日 上午 6:55 
There seems to be an invalid judgment:
In the FHIR HPModifier method of the ddl file, if (hediff.Part == null || (part != null && hediff.Part != part) || (!(hediff is Hediff_AddedPart) && ! After (hediff is Heddiff_Simplant), if (part==null) is also determined
{
num2 *= hediff.Part.coverageAbsWithChildren;
}.
In theory, these two conditions should be mutually exclusive. The second if will never hold, or is there a problem with my understanding:steamhappy:
Palasis 9 月 7 日 上午 11:52 
Thank you very much friend.