安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题











The funny thing about base game Autocracy and Oligarchy, it is like this mod version of Autocracy and Oligarchy, but swapped between the two government types.
-Rather than switching their bonuses, I'd prefer if autocracy and oligarchy had their policy card slots switched instead. For me it makes more sense to keep the bonuses where they are but shuffle the card slots around.
-Buffing fascism is fine, but it might make the AI prioritize it a lot more than they should. It grants a whopping 3 wildcard policy slots, while the other two only grant one. Maybe change communism to have a wildcard replace a military? Alternatively, grant fascism an economic slot instead of a wildcard. Still a buff as economic slots are overall better.
-If possible, could you rename the governments to have better political nuance and refer to systems of governance rather than economic or social policies/philosophies? Look to JDR's "Rule with faith" for what I'm talking about. For example, it replaces "Fascism" with "Military Dictatorship"