安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题











Only for some ♥♥♥♥ head vassals to tank MA losing stupid ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ holywars.
Will try this out but I might just block all holy wars except wars declared by the religious head.
So I've wanted to test your mod since I've noticed in one of my playthroughs that there were really few holy wars (if not zero). I've done so by starting a new game in 936 because after some months Bulgaria Empire will always declare holy war on the Pechenegs (unless they're attacked by the Byz, just restart the run in that case). But, when the mod is on, he doesn't declare holy war but rather the "liberate duchy" one (I've switched on and off a couple times and always goes this way).
So is this intended that AI gives priority to others CB even if they can HolyWar?
The emperor of Bulgaria is "content" but as I've understood independent rulers can be whatever right? Also he isn't both "content" and "brave" so it isn't checking the "king" requirements either.
I have the dlc too ahahah I've bough the imperial collection of CK2 on instant gaming at 25€ .
Thanks anyway for you help ^^