安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
奖励
Finally someone who understands this. It'd be like splitting the Hellenic faith into multiple regional cultures like "Lacedonian", "Dorian", "Macedonian" etc. People don't even portray the Roman faith as being any different than the Greek one, which it was. It was even more split apart then Anglo & Norse due to their Pre-Etruscan roots. It's worth pointing out that the Etruscans Hellenised Roman myth, but the Etruscan religion was also quite unique.
What'd be best is if all cultures, even the Swedes, Geats, Norweigans, Jutes and Danes all had their own religions. Like Sweden having a higher emphasis on Freyja and Thor (in the temple of Uppsala, the Thor idol was seated on a throne suggesting he was king. Similar to Perun and Veles's rivalry. However Thor (light, electricity, friction) could be visually shown as king whereas Odin (sound, wind, friction) said to be king)
The Faroese were said to worship two malevolent female Jotun aswell, named Thorgerd and Irpa.
The Norweigans worshipped a friendly Jotun named "Skadi".
I think there could be varying degrees of hostility between these cults, and perhaps an option to switch between them like the Hindus, Buddhists & Jains could switch in CK2 (why do they always represent Indian polytheists well but noone else).