商店页面
工人与资源：苏维埃共和国 Workers & Resources: Soviet Republic
全部 讨论 截图 艺术作品 实况直播 视频 创意工坊 新闻 指南 评测

工人与资源：苏维埃共和国 Workers & Resources: Soviet Republic

商店页面
Workers & Resources: Soviet Republic >  创意工坊 > Benco54 的创意工坊
460 个评价
Run-of-river hydroelectricity
描述 讨论0 留言41 改动说明
17
11
5
2
2
   
奖励
收藏
已收藏
取消收藏
Building
Buildings (by category): Industrial facility
文件大小
发表于
更新日期
13.346 MB
2020 年 8 月 3 日 上午 9:14
2020 年 8 月 12 日 下午 4:30
4 项改动说明 （ 查看 ）
创建者
Benco54
离线
查看所有 2662 个合集（也许有些被隐藏了）
56,966 不重复访客数
43,626 当前订阅者
926 当前收藏人数

订阅以下载
Run-of-river hydroelectricity

描述
Run-of-river hydroelectricity (ROR) or run-of-the-river hydroelectricity is a type of hydroelectric generation plant whereby little or no water storage is provided. Run-of-the-river power plants may have no water storage at all or a limited amount of storage, in which case the storage reservoir is referred to as pondage. A plant without pondage is subject to seasonal river flows, thus the plant will operate as an intermittent energy source. Conventional hydro uses reservoirs, which regulate water for flood control, dispatchable Electrical power, and the provision of fresh water for agriculture.

This powerplant produce 160MW/d.

It needs 20 workers.

Need only water access!

Its based on the Run-of-the-river hydroelectricity plant in Zurich: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kraftwerk_Letten

41 条留言
< >
Sea Fairy 7 月 25 日 下午 11:58 
For people who thinks this is under-powered, this is not. You must have a dam to maximize the energy output of hydro-power. But dams are very expensive to build, even Quebec (in Canada) is a world superpower in hydro-power and yet they take at least 10 years to build a whole dam. And that despite the Quebec government is social-liberal and have an absolute monopoly on the local energy market.

So a small well instead is a good choice if you want some cheaper energy but not having to trade your soul for it. And they just make sense they don't produce much.
Жулик 3 月 3 日 下午 2:52 
@neigrok you can change it in building.ini file with $PRODUCTION eletric 25
neigrok 1 月 12 日 下午 3:00 
Идея отличная. Сделано красиво. Но 3.8 МВт за такую дикую цену? При такой цене строительства и содержания, отдача энергии должна быть от 10 МВт и выше. Иначе красиво, но смысла нет.
sargatanus 2024 年 10 月 12 日 上午 10:59 
I just can't seem to place this. It says either "building cannot be placed on water", then I move it one pixel and its "some parts of this build must be built on water. What am I missing here?
warmike_1 2023 年 11 月 17 日 下午 1:21 
It works, though it's really frustrating to try to find a place for it.
Mr.[MediC]GER 2023 年 10 月 4 日 上午 9:56 
I cant find the building. Where do i need to navigate to find it in the menu? Thanks :)
t.latzke(Ger) 2023 年 9 月 3 日 上午 7:37 
Produces no electricity ! Doesn't seem to work anymore
MoistTowelette 2023 年 7 月 7 日 上午 11:27 
@Araxiel useful info thanks! changed mine as well
Dante 2022 年 8 月 16 日 上午 11:18 
How do you place this building? I tried with landscape editor, it's always either too much on land or too much in water.
Araxiel 2022 年 1 月 23 日 下午 4:25 
Really nice building, but massively underpowered (pun intended) if you ask me.
I decided to more than double it's power output. If someone else wants to do that with, simply go to
*\steamapps\workshop\content\784150\2186454765\water_eletric and in building.ini change line 19 $PRODUCTION eletric 8 to another value.

I changed the value to $PRODUCTION eletric 20 which puts it at 400 MWh, which is lower than the vanilla Solar Power Plant (which does 560MWh)