安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题










I have a question about the mod settings: I have run quite a few games using 3x for tech/culture cost, extreme era scaling (for both science and culture), and all other parameters set to "calculated" (era score, age progression, CO2 levels,...).
Is this the "most optimal" setup? Or should I use different parameters?
Last game I ended up in 1970 when the world barely reached Renaissance Age, while I was already going for Nuclear fusion tech. Something is definitely wrong.
Thanks for the help.
Imo, this is like playing chess where every piece is a Queen, it removes a lot of the fun from the games depth and critical thinking skills.
Because Firaxis never seemed to care to balance out tech or civic progression much as they added content and the pacing became just awful the more DLC they put out.
And the modularity on this is wonderful. Excellent work all around!