安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
you may do this, BUT how about having them deal a LOT less damage on range=2.
- research archers and have 5 of them as fasdt as possible) (only build slingshots, no builder/settler)
- never even once build any settler/worker/district/building (spamming archers is just better)
- only have archers and 2-4 cheap warriors, only to capture empty cities.
. only when you are blocked by coasts everywhere, build transport ships. archers easily protect them.
archer-rushes in groups >10 can only be defeated by larger archer rushes.
so its all about archers, and this ends up me having 50 to 100 archers on highest difficulty, having captured half of the world, before anyone has walls or crossbows.
but this only lowers an upper limit to this, it does not really address the issue.
Now it feels more challenging to play specially because of these nerfs to ranged units