安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









The issue is on line 69:
{"ToolFishingRodGood", {"Pole", "StringBall"}, {2,3}, 1},
It should read something more like this:
{"ToolFishingRodGood", {"Pole", "StringBall", "Crank", "Cog", "Axle"},{4,4,1,1,1},1},
I wonder if you would be interested in making it a standalone storage container, or even just a non-interactive placeable object because I'd love to use that for tool storage.
It will be great when everything can be traded.
So much the better if you can buy and sell at the same price.
In addition, it is suggested that the price of processed goods is higher than the raw materials, so that we can experience the pleasure of processing.
For example, a log can be processed into 2 boards, and 2 boards can be processed into 4 wooden posts.So the price of 4 posts should be higher than the price of 1 log.
Finally, I experienced this thing.I think it would be better to use the same payment method as the research station.That may cross the tech hierarchy, but that's not necessarily a bad thing.Maybe some players want a high-tech thing, but they don't want to develop technology.At this time it is a very happy thing to be able to buy one.