安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









The 9x39 sp6 cartridge is capable of piercing 8 mm steel at 100 m, 6 mm steel or 2.8mm titatium or 30 layers of kevlar at 200 m, 2 mm steel at 500.
SOURCE: https://www.reddit.com/r/EscapefromTarkov/comments/bwq3yr/clearing_up_misconceptions_about_the_9x39/
The “BP (AP)” bullet provides breaking through of a steel sheet with a thickness of 7 mm made of steel of grade St.3 at a distance of 100 m.
SOURCE:
http://www.dogswar.ru/boepripasy/patrony/7712-promejytochnyi-patro.html
For comparison, 5.56 caliber m995 ammo penetrates 12mm of steel at 100m.
SOURCE:
https://www.nammo.com/product/our-products/ammunition/small-caliber-ammunition/5-56mm-series/5-56-mm-x-45-armor-piercing-3/
Dont get me wrong, the bullet balance is amazing (in my opinion) I just hope that the 9x39 at least has its penetrating abilities that it should have (I can understand the lower HP damage).
Note in this example that a standard load .357 has less impact damage than a .45, but a magnum .357 does slightly more damage. It would then seem that the best way to account for this would be to take the weight and fps into account and give the .45 a higher impact/shock and the .357 a bit more HP.
Perhaps if the devs included a 'knock-back' factor, where an attacking player or Z would be knocked-back and stunned for a moment by a non-lethal hit from something with a heavy power factor... That first round from your .45 might not kill it, but by gosh it gives you a split second to squeeze off a couple more. That would be realistic.