安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









One's mind can really get away with you. I particularly liked your "Why don't you assume that the enemy can hack into your PC and uninstall Stellaris?"
For a design level purpose, why should a Gateway be hackable? You are discouraging the player from using advanced stuff, because anything seemingly confortable now can be a weapon of your enemy to be used against you.
Why don't you assume that the enemy can find a hack of your fleet and use them to attack you instead?
Why don't you assume that the enemy can find a hack of your planets and dismantle everything they can and resettle every pop into their own planets as slaves?
Why don't you assume that the enemy can hack into your PC and uninstall Stellaris?
So, why to assume that the Gateway is hackable?