安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









As for the 2nd one, the sensors (2) have sub grids turned off. We did setup a drone replacer on a large grid rotor with a small grid head. For some reason the small rotor head when a ship is built on it is seen as a detached grid and not a sub-grid. even if its attached. SE issue im guessing? it took us some time to figure it out.
As for the Whitelist, We have a parking lot thats on the other side of the zone some of them are a bit long and keep it triggered, so he have to park them outside our safe zone
We have some grids we cant find in the zone
Yes you are right, there still is the possibility that drones crash into each other on the border of the "exclusive area". This script is meant as an extension to PAM for users who already use PAM alot and are quite familiar with it.
When you have a whole fleet managed by PAM already, then you must plan all their paths to avoid intersections as much as possible. PAM-ELA only helps at that narrow hangar situation, where intersections are not avoidable. The idea is, that the sensor area covers all the intersections and your planning covers the border so that there each drone has an individual spot to transit.