安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
奖励
I was thinking of something similar to orbital bombardment or just long range sniping of enemy station grids. But anyway. I feel the projectile range is just too short. Maybe effective range for in combat of 3KM but the projectile should live for 50KM or more. I mean, what if you miss while shooting towards your own base! :O Whoops!
Also I think the description is wrong. Railguns aren't used for close quarter combat, they are used for heavy hitting of slow moving or stationary targets. With extreme power behind them, they can penetrate just about anything. As you see in The Expanse, railguns are used to target the Martian retaliation system on all corners of the solar system.
thrusters are slower in space due to the fact they push to move and have nothing to push off in space so your speed is like wagin g your arms to move on a skateboard without using feet to push off floor
while a magnetic field works perfectly in space and would prepell a object faster than u could turn on yoir engin in space
while lasers blood in dust wich fills space
plasma disperces to match the space it has due to space being empty plasma would never hit a target
railguns are the most realistic space weapon and only weapon that could get any range in space while maintaining acuracy