安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题










Glad your liking it overall :P
(had to split this comment into 2 comments cause of the 1000 character limit..)
The 4-lane national road as a highway I'd prefer as 2x2-lane highways instead.
The only other thing I'd personally change would be adding some other trees to couple up with the redwoods. The redwoods look great from a distance, but when you draw closer I think the forests could use another tree variation there too. When I play the game (instead of making maps myself..) I tend to pay close attention to detail in the city and a redwood-only-forest will take a bit away from it. It's easy for me to add those trees with a tree brush afterwards though, so I think it's a good map I'll probably pick up some time.
I'd guess you used only the redwoods also to avoid using a trillion trees, which I think is smart since not everyone "needs" a detailed treeline up close. Easily fixed by anyone who wants more detail on the map.