安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









These are all pointless questions.
Me personally, as you could already guessed it, prefer 20r magazines.
One more thing on why using 20 can give you an advantage. Of course 20 can't be divided by 3, and that's the reason why it leads to more jamming, but! Smaller mags means more mags as well as less bullets in each. As you may know, new US doctrine says something like it is preferable to develop weapons with lower firerate so soldiers wouldn't burn through ammo that quickly (at stressful situations or in general). 20r mags can potentually help with that as well, because while you are reloading you can have some time to asses the situation.
Sorry for my broken english.