安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题












10x10 area does not occupy 2 times the area of a 5x5, it takes up 4 times. That means that one Larger Stockpile Storage which holds 25,000 units loses out to four Stockpile Storage which holds 40,000 units total. There is no practical way this building is more suitable for storage than the smaller version save for when it's to be tucked away where it would be inaccessible on three sides.
But here just small math note: maybe footprint sounds like two times bigger but by space it's four time more, so maybe could we get more capacity? With four your small ones I have 4x 10k and still some space between for fence. What about round it to 50k? Thanks again ;)