安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题










What I would really like to change/improve is the balance of the districts. Myself, when playing, always go for 2-3 particular districts, the others are much more of a toss up. So what would help to make the other's more desirable to you?
Also, the update version will also allow a different amount of districts - one for each built settlement in a province. The other interesting improvement for me is the new ambition to create a new settlement slot once the max number of districts have been built - this would mean that with enough time and careful management any province would be capable of having 7 settlements and thus 7 district types!
However, and I can't stress this enough, it's not a system for the human player. It's intended to add variety to the game and not just create the world as the human player seems fit. Think of it as being no different to gaining provinces with settlements already built - they may not be ideal butyou have to work with what is there, or give it to another character and find one more to you liking.
If you can explain why the AI's choices are horrible I may be able to improve them