安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
thx to Solwra
even so, map does seem to have a great quality to it, subscribing and testing it :)
Thanks for the work @Karose :)
I haven't actually looked at this map, but from the pictures, the infrastructure looks really high quality and realistic.
Karose, maybe I can help out here. Like JustDucky says, I think it is best to delete the term vanilla not because it's not correct, but because if users do not also subscribe to Unlimited Trees mod, it will cause them to have some serious errors when trying to open a map with more than 250k trees. So, for the people who don't even come to the page here to find out that they need Unlimited Trees and a tree pack, it will be best to take out the word Vanilla from the title. If you want to get as many folks as you can, you could add something like "only 1 tree & 1 mod required" to your title :D It's true, after all. Happy mapping!