安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









Ceres in real life has a surface gravity of 0.027g. It has a mass of 8.96x10^20 kg and a diameter of 946 km. This gives it a density of 2.08 g/cm^3. This is roughly twice the density of water.
Your planetoid has a 'in lore' diameter of 19 km and a surface gravity of 0.1g. Given its radius and surface gravity, it would realistically have a mass 9007.2 times that of real-life Ceres. Contained within a volume 123427.7 times smaller. Thus its density must be 1111737979.4 times greater than that of Ceres. To be fair, it's still a hundred times less dense than your typical neutron star.