安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题










So there still was 1x1 in this one? = Cool It will give me more game play next time I go in.
Thanks for sharing and I will have a look at it some day, for no SE got all my attention.
I was usin only 1X1 at that time so it was breaking only one small block at a time when it was damaged and I don't do this anymore cause the game is better than at the beginning.
Keep testing different concept = is anpther thing I like.
Tho I like to find a concept that uses less blocks as possible to be able to build it faster in survival.
It's a challenge I like to do
Would need a lot of votes on this idea (on the Vote Portal) for the Devs to think about adding.