安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









* With Your suspension (stabilized by ropes) the loco max (peak) speed 43km/h, sustained speed about 36km/k. One wheel lost towards the end of the test without critically imparing the performance.
* Mine (present version): peak about 47km/h sustained about 39km/h.
Conditions: 4-8-4 Heavy with all three engines at max throttle with 50 weights in the midestion chest.
@Johnbeere: That would be unlikely. It seems that the hitboxes are flat on the top. Rather, there may be some tiny but sudden changes of angles at the section merge points due to whatever method Equinox used for calculating the geometry of sections when merging them. Splines should not cause problems but I do not know what was really used. Also there is an issue of how the simplified algorithms of the game engine handle the interacion with hitboxes. The dependence on the computer resorces points to that as a culprit.