安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
奖励
I think guns are a really useful component of our land bombardment strategy, but we need to actually build those weapons and equip our cruisers with them.
The Zumwalt is good for what it was designed for, it just didn't meet the cost requisites, which is okay, since economies of scale dramatically cut costs. We should finish building 30 Zumwalts so long as we get the price down per ship, like how we got the F-35 price down more than 50%.
Most of the time the USN is not deploying ships with full missile compliments so as to allow other ships to have a missile compliment; an Arsenal Ship would almost single-handedly use up a fairly siginficant percentage of the Navy's missiles.
Also, the only way to get 1,000 SAMs on a ship would be to use quad-packed ESSMs, which are a very short-ranged weapon, a BB captain would most likely demand that some of those tubes be filled with something more long-ranged, like the SM-6 or even SM-3 for BMD duty.
The main batteries on a Battleship, while also not guarenteed to give a 1-hit kill, would almost certainly result in a mission-kill on the target, and would have a higher probability of a devastating "lucky hit" resulting in a magazine explosion like on the HMS Hood. even if you had to fire multiple shots to kill the target, again, Battleship shells are far cheaper than missiles.
The original idea behind the extended-ranged shells for the Zumwalt class was to convert 16" gun shells for the Iowa class to be able to shoot accurately at ranges over 100 Nautical Miles.
The 16" HE shell does the same amount of damage as a TLAM does, but for much much much less cost, extend it's range out to say, 90 NM; you gain ranges sufficient to hit targets much farther inland with the same power as a TLAM, but with much less cost. the 16" AP shell can penetrate almost 30 feet of reinforced concrete at or slightly below ground level; short of a Nuke, only very specialized bombs dropped from jets can replicate that, which again, said bombs are very expensive, and only a very limited number were ever built.
This would allow the ship to operate alone, or with a small ASW frigate escort, wielding as much firepower as a carrier battle group.
In the 1980s, the principle was the same, 4 CWIS mounted on the ship + the 12 5" guns firing heavy flak and they always sailed with heavy ASW and Cruiser escorts.