安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Indeed, when facing a lone opponent, it can be easier to win if you strike at just the right moment, leveraging the stagger effect to your advantage. This approach seems more realistic to me than scenarios where adversaries show no reaction to being hit. However, when you're up against a group of enemies, the strategy backfires; you're likely to suffer from stagger effects much more than your opponents.
I just have a little concern: while i find it to be very balanced for the player, I feel bad for the enemies when they stagger. Staggering now last less, true. But it happens to the enemies a little to often I think. Once I get a hit in and they stagger, I can just keep hitting them and they'll be perma staggering. Or does this only happen with low level enemies?
Either way, fantastic mod!
Thank You for your comment.
I believe, however, and this is a personal opinion, that a two-handed sword against a group of archers is risky and that it is better in this situation to use a shield to protect yourself from arrows. If you don't have a shield, then you may have to approach discreetly and try to ambush the enemy archers.
Dueling makes some situations more complicated and you will have to use cunning to defeat your enemies.