安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









This guide has been on steam for more than a year (lol).
I'm sure that armor value has been tweaked by developers
Will check that out and update them in my free time, thanks for asking
This guide is the one and only great tank guide on Steam
It makes zero sense since T-62 that can be acquired in Russia(and those that were sent to Syria) are most likely already upgraded with add-on BDD arrays...etc.
Warrior dominates other APCs due to tank armor to front (and last I tested, T-90's HEAT does zero damage to front of warrior hull...somehow).
For the Warrior, that's another problem, because on some maps we have British Army versus Militia or Insurgents. For weird balance issues, sometimes it will be T-62 v.s Warrior, not even a challenger. It sucks, but that's how developers apply "gaming balance" and made Rarden 30mm possible to punch though the T-62...
T-62 had laser rangefinders since 1972 and Warrior does not have enough penetration to go through frontal hull no matter how much "I heard this story from gulf war" there is.
30mm AP from RARDEN cannon on Warrior is advertised to do 40mm at 45degree angle at 1000m, while T-62 has at least 100mm 60/55(iirc, for lower frontal plate)degree frontal hull armor.
Assume penetration doubles at 10m, it's still no where near good enough to penetrate front of an unupgraded T-62.