安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题











you might as it depends more on the weapons themself and not on the weaponframework (for example vanilla, weaponcore) or weaponframeworkaddon (for example vanilla+, rearths advanced combat systems) how much range a weapon has and i am prettty sure i already have seen vanilla+ weapons with 50+km range.
and i am pretty sure most of them have given them weapons with multiple km range or activly moved within theyre 2km area or got bad luck and theyre flight path was close enough to theyre position.
did myself a salvage only run (so no mining for any ressources and only scrappign stuff or using tradestation to get ressources) with parallax, imber, incon, toc, wreckage and reavers in the world and wasnt getting roastet by them if i didnt go after them and miscalculated and i gave them randomized weapons with the longes range ones reaching up to 5km in form of guided missiles and 2km in form of direct fire weapons via the weapon randomizer.
if imber and incon are a 2/10 with 10 the highest danger i would sort parallax on a 3 and reavers on a 5 with looking on all mes mods i tried over the years and theyre balancing, wreckage would come out on a 1/10 and toc as 0/10.