安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
奖励
Why bother building or using the small or large thermopile when there are better alternatives? Wind, solar or geothermal produce a non-insignificant amount of power without requiring ANY fuel. For that matter, I'd rather build a generator that consumes cheap fuel like wood or chemfuel.
Then there's the fact that I could install and use a different mod to build a nuclear thermopile that requires much less fuel or runs indefinitely. I could do that. However, the other aspects of this mod seem appealing to me. I'd even consider using the thermopiles, if only the fuel consumption was more reasonable.
Your mods for A19 are for the most part stable, from what i've observed their are some issues regarding item weights and depreciated implementation, but everything works as I believe it was intended to do so. I can speak for everything but simple fish as far as 1.0 is concerned.
I've seen other nuclear thermopile mods and none require a stead and regular supply of uranium. The RTGs , for example, produce 750w, yet the uranium is a one-time building material cost as it does not need replacing.
There are some nuclear power plant mods ( not thermopile) that do consume uranium. However, most consume a sizeable amount of uranium and produce a large amount of power - usually at least 5 kw or 10 kw - and last about an in-game year or longer.