商店页面
Total War: ATTILA
全部 讨论 截图 艺术作品 实况直播 视频 创意工坊 新闻 指南 评测

Total War: ATTILA

商店页面
Total War: ATTILA >  创意工坊 > Greq7 的创意工坊
47 个评价
Autoresolve
描述 讨论1 留言24 改动说明
   
奖励
收藏
已收藏
取消收藏
标签： mod, Campaign
文件大小
发表于
更新日期
222.542 KB
2018 年 6 月 26 日 下午 4:33
2018 年 7 月 26 日 上午 8:43
19 项改动说明 （ 查看 ）
创建者
Greq7
离线
查看所有由 Greq7 和其他人创建的 120 个合集（也许有些被隐藏了）
4,725 不重复访客数
900 当前订阅者
94 当前收藏人数

订阅以下载
Autoresolve

在 Greq7 的 5 个合集中
Sub Modifications of "Very Hard Campaign Overhaul"
31 件物品
1 click Vanilla "Very hard Campaign Overhaul"
25 件物品
1 Click ERE Campaign
23 件物品
1 Click WRE Campaign
25 件物品
1 Click Vanilla [Other than Rome] "Very Hard Campaign Overhaul"
26 件物品
描述
Fair, Bloody and Less Predictable Battle Autoresolve
Mod well tested
Fully compatible with all other mods
Submod and stand alone version of "Radious - Very Hard Campiagn Overhaul"
Save game compatible

This is a different version of "Better Autoresolve" by Minos and "Less Reliable Autoresolve" by Magnar. I have edited exactly same tables but the stats are adjusted to the the needs of "Very Hard Campaign Overhaul" project. You don't need this mod if you are already subscribed to that overhaul.

It gives you slightly less predictable outcomes and battles are bloody. I have tried to make this as fair as possible for AI and player. I am not 100% sure but it may influence AI decisions about whether to attack, bring more reinforcements or hide. In my opinion the outcomes are more realistic than in vanila and it gives a breathing space for player as well as for AI because armies needs to recover even after winning battles. Other submod "AI" makes it much smarter and aggressive so that breathing space is needed. I really hated in vanilla when one stack of army could jump around and destroy everything around without many losses. It is still possible with this mod but you'd need few more stacks to ensure massive advantage.

credits should go to Minos as I would not be able to even guess where those tables are and how to change them. He probably have done countless hours of testing for this as it is very delicate and very responsive table. Please let me know what you think in the comments after allowing at least 20/30 battles. Different overhauls will give different results because AI's army compositions will have an impact of the results.

My advice is to always choose balanced battle stance. Aggressive and protective stances are very very tricky and works only in some circumstances. For example Protective stance would make sense if your army could retreat after defeat to near settlement, otherwise AI would just follow and destroy what's left of your army. Aggressive seems to work when you have numbers or more powerful units but this can lead to defeat if the numbers are not much greater than your opponents.

热门讨论 查看全部（1）
3
2018 年 7 月 26 日 下午 7:44
置顶： Screenshots and videos from autoresolve
Greq7
24 条留言
< >
hahaha 2022 年 6 月 7 日 下午 11:09 
Siege weapons die too much
Somanom 2021 年 6 月 1 日 下午 7:21 
Hey Greq7, using your mod, what values could I increase or decrease in the database to make the autoresolve match our personal battle results? My friend and I don't have any unfair advantages over the AI, but even when we are at a significant troop quantity disadvantage, we end up pulling out a heroic victory. We just want the autoresolve to reflect more accurately. Getting tired of forcing ourselves to fight easy wins. Any help would be great, thanks.
Greq7  [作者] 2020 年 1 月 30 日 上午 2:32 
Gaius I will look into this as soon as possible. Ill let you know here in the comments once its repaired. Pls subscribe to thread. Thx
大黄太阳枪 2020 年 1 月 27 日 下午 4:05 
Doesn't calculate cavalry archers at all. My 3k hun army full of hunnic bows vs 1.3 k barbarian army, and I still lose 600 men. This obviously shouldn't happen, considering the fact that cavalry archers should never be touched by the enemy.
菠萝神选 2019 年 3 月 18 日 上午 5:53 
隐藏自动战条
Greq7  [作者] 2018 年 7 月 26 日 下午 5:17 
@to all users of this mod: My advice is to always choose balanced battle stance. Aggressive and protective stances are very very tricky and works only in some circumstances. For example Protective stance would make sense if your army could retreat after defeat to near settlement, otherwise AI would just follow and destroy what's left of your army. Aggressive seems to work when you have numbers or more powerful units but this can lead to defeat if the numbers are not much greater than your opponents.
Greq7  [作者] 2018 年 7 月 26 日 下午 2:39 
I gave penalties for missiles and for ammo and this worked like a charm. Also reduced number of kills they inflict. This mod is still more bloody than in Vanilla and I want to keep it that way but thanks to your feedback littleShepherd It has been improved towards more realistic and logical approach. Thx
Greq7  [作者] 2018 年 7 月 26 日 下午 2:36 
Yeah you are right now the settlements has more imaginary towers so it should do and ranged units are not too op now Im certain. I have tested some battles that in vanila basicly player lose because of ranged units of AI and now with this mod you win! still marginally but at least its a win so its an improvement from Vanilla. That is why we need a proper mod for AI army composition.

I think Xai's is very close to optimal But I have to look at it more closely and test some more. I might create my own soon
Sheph 2018 年 7 月 26 日 下午 12:49 
Why not just increase the power of towers and walls in autoresolve? Ranged should be very powerful for settlement defense, especially for cities. Slingers though are pretty much useless in minor settlements. Archers with a high altitude shots do pretty good.

What mod do you recommend to rebalance armies to be 80+% melee and cav?
I know the table, but not how it works.
Greq7  [作者] 2018 年 7 月 26 日 上午 8:22 
Now with this mod you guys need good modification for AI recruitment policies.