安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题










Voilà.
It explains how Franks dominated the whole region except Great Britain despite the weak central position to defend, surrounded by enemies. Others are limited by the sea (Atlantic Ocean, the Channel and North Sea or huge mountains like Alps (Swiss, south east, low right border of the map) and Pyrenees, Spain, low left border).
To answer, they give res, because mines are next to them foremost. I don't know how to enable to build only in selected areas with triggers (you can only with data mod in my opinion and i don't know how). Anyway, I don't think it's a acurate idea. Why? It is a matter of fact that some new towns growed better and were founding next to ancient roman towns sometimes just deserted by retreating Romans, especially soldiers.
Some bugs are not my fact: you can convert TCs back for only line of sight and can't directly garrison units in them (but the town bells works).
In fact it is not very serious because the goal is here only to figure the Roman foundations which were sometimes burned or less efficient in defenses purpose.
It figures out too how you can use local population (gallo romans, because Romans also didnt kill all the gauls and married with them) instead of killing them: it's a bit like a conversion of endless vils.