安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









It does tell me that the scoring is a bit arbitrary as a result, since the size of the trucks used has a HUGE amount of weighting of the score, and for reasons that don't really have a logistics basis. When in the heck would it benefit a trucking company or its freight recipient to (taking it to the extreme) receive 320 tuck tucks versus 16 articulated, 8 b-double, or where possible 4 road trains or a couple of mining trucks? The paperwork!
The net result is for me that I am more about successfully completing the game than worrying about the high score for a town. So, I feel more understanding for the scoring system, but actually less interested in it as a result. YMMV